Example 3: I don’t know situations in other areas. But in Sichuan, after the flood in 1998 and the earthquake on 12th May ,2008, local governments encourage residents to rebuild their houses in traditional styles by giving subsidy（津贴，补助）on a percentage of 10%- 20% . For some scenic spots, the allowance（津贴）can be higher to 40% . The range of stylish buildings can be specific and unique scenery when the city or town catches your eyes. So I say “yes” to the policy of traditional buildings in some degree. But I insist that it should be based on the affording ability of the local economy and the inhabitants. Facial value should give way to the practical living standard. In fact, I don’t think building style is the radical（根本的，基本的）factor for the protection of culture identity. The most elegant（—流的，上品的）and essential strategy is to convince the residents that assimilation（同化）is not the only tendency in modern world. If they are confident in their original living style, I think cultural identity is not difficult to protect.

Brief Comment（简评）：Example 3列举了四川地区在灾后重建工作中对老建筑样式的保护工作。恰当地采用例证法进行作答可以使回答显得更为具体，也可增强可信度。

新形态2021